Decide

A pipeline that tells you what is going wrong.

Move applications through the stages that role actually uses, with service-level tracking that surfaces the candidate nobody has touched in nine days. Schedule interviews with a prepared brief, and run the technical round in the product instead of over a screen share.

Who it is for
Hiring managers and recruiters who need to know what is stuck
The problem
The board looks fine. Meanwhile a strong candidate has been sitting in 'client review' for two weeks and nobody noticed.

What it does

The short version.

  • SLA tracking per stageAt-risk and overdue are computed, not remembered.
  • Interviews with a prepared briefThe interviewer walks in knowing the candidate.
  • Live coding, in the productA shared editor the candidate opens from a link — no install, no login.

In detail

What is actually in here.

The modules behind this stage. Each one is specified and built against a written brief before it ships.

  • PipelineStage boards with SLA configuration, per-job stage lists, and AI-assisted prioritisation of what to work on next.
  • InterviewsScheduling, feedback capture, reminder queue, and an AI-prepared interview brief.
  • Live coding interviewsA shared code editor for the technical round, opened by the candidate from a signed link that carries no candidate or organization id.
  • EvaluationsStructured scoring and verdicts recorded against the application, not left in someone's notebook.

The AI boundary

What the model offers, and what you own.

AI proposes

An interview brief, and a suggested order of attention across the pipeline.

A person confirms

Every stage move, every evaluation and every hiring decision is made by a person.

Try it on one role.

Create a workspace and open a job. Nothing here requires you to migrate anything first.